Killshot to Jews, Protestants and Atheists

So, I have been meaning to write on this but this guy’s video does an eminently better job than I would.

It probes beyond doubt that ALL the Protestant Bibles are corrupt, unlike the Catholic Bibles.

In fact that is the only gripe I have when he says ALL our Bibles are corrupt. No. All PROTESTANT Bibles are corrupt. The Catholic Bibles have the correct dates and sentences in them.

And of course, who caused the deception?

The usual suspects. And I’m impressed he names them. Enjoy this video, I started it thinking “Oh who cares, I know about the pyramids…” give it a few minutes, and it becomes very interesting indeed.

I can hear the Protestants crying already:

“Well that doesn’t change anything about Catholics worshiping Mary and the saints!”

“The genealogy doesn’t really matter to the central theme…”

Uh-huh. Suuuuure. The fact is, as I have been telling you for years, Protestantism is yet another Jewish deception.

Swallow your prideful ego and accept the bare facts Catholicism is the ONLY Christianity; and Sedevacantists are the ONLY Catholics left.

That is it. One. So would you PLEASE pay attention?!?

The enemy always, always, ALWAYS plays BOTH SIDES OF THE COIN. That’s it.

That is the entirety of his strategy.

American Revolution. Bankers and Freemason’s war. Funded by French money that resulted in the death of their king and queen and created the first freemasonic country in the world. World War I. Bankers and Freemason’s War. Aim was to destroy the remaining royal houses. Why? Because the royal houses were originally assumed to be ruling by God’s divine choice in picking such kings and queens. And the secular arm of the Church Militant is led by nobility, hence royal houses. They couldn’t infiltrate and damage the Church very seriously if not by first removing their bodyguards, so to speak.

World War II. A Banker’s war if ever there was one. Read the three small books of Antony Sutton: Hitler and Wall Street. No one has ever been able to refute anything he wrote.

Vatican II. Jewish, Freemason, Protestant and “Orthodox” assault on the Catholic Church. 16 documents 15 of which are filled with direct heresy and one of which states the other 15 are to be spread across the Earth. The inversion of what used to be the Catholic Church.

Left vs. Right. That’s it. Argue about whether you should be ok with LGBTPedo nonsense in primary schools or just in highschool. In pride parades or just in gay “marriage”.

Republicans or Democrats. Labour or Tory. Blah, blah, blah.

Don’t you get it yet?

All the fake “Catholics” pretending to be critical of Bergoglio and very “traditional”, are ALL fake and gay. Milo the Freemason. Nikky Fuentes the gay latino. Ye the black American black Hebrew now oh so scandalous “antisemite”.

America First. Maga hats. Hillary and Bill.

Do you not get it yet?

They literally told everyone over 200 years ago that their ploy is to always control both sides and win either way.

Why do you think the thugs that are government get together and decide what “laws” YOU need to live by that they are exempt from?

Why do you think Hillary and Bill are not in jail as the mass murderers they are?

Why do you think Macron the Oedipus complex guy and his cronies forced genetic serums on the French people with a vengeance and yet he himself and his cronies never took it themselves?

Do you not get it yet? You are being PLAYED.

Always.

So stop supporting either “side” make your own side. What are you willing to go to the wall for?

Family? friends? Sure. But it’s not enough. They do divide those. Look at the covid scamdemic. Families split apart.

So what else?

What is the ONE thing they have ALWAYS fought against? Who has ALWAYS called them out?

There is only one answer to that:

The real, One, Holy, Apostolic, Catholic —and in this day and age— Sedevacantist, Church.

Why do you think they spent 300 years meticulously planning its assault and infiltration with communists, pedophiles, freemasons and deceivers? (Don’t take my word for it, their own repentant servants admitted it. See Bella Dodd, see L’eletta del Dragone, and others) Why do you think they don’t care at all about any of the 40,000 denominations of Protestantism? Or about the Copts? Or even about the so-called Eastern “Orthodox”?

Why do you think the most pernicious and insidious infiltrations, lies and attacks have always been against the Catholic Church?

Why do you think the Vatican, that hive of pedophile, satanic scum commissioned journalists to write screeds against sedevacantism but not against Lutheranism, which they in fact celebrated? As they did placing a literal statue of Moloch at the colosseum, a stone’s throw from the Vatican?

Why do you think they make overtures of friendly communal “worship” to Jews, Muslims, Protestants and “Orthodox” but react like vampires when shown the cross as soon as sedevacantism is mentioned?

Think. Think, oh my lost, quasi-godless friend.

Think. And if you want to check my work, go ahead, read Believe! Or RTCC, or both and try and find error with anything I wrote. Both books have plenty of references, so it should be easy for you to prove me wrong if I am.

“Oh but I hate the Catholic Church… they can’t be the One because…”

Save it. I was there before you and for most of my life. I despised “Catholicism” with a passion.

Because what I THOUGHT was Catholicism wasn’t.

You don’t KNOW what Catholicism is. You have been lied about it since birth. If you DO find out, WHEN you do, you will become a sedevacantist Catholic.

It requires you are able to reason and do logic and change your mind based on facts though.

And Aristotle told us long ago, such people are the minority.

That’s ok. The Bible tells us we actual Christians are a minority too.

What are you willing to go to the wall for?

I know what I am willing to do it for.

God.

Family.

And if need be, my ORIGINAL country too. Which needs to rise again from the sea, as it does and always did.

What about you, friend?

Are you a Catholic too? Because Jesus was pretty clear about there being only ONE body (Corinthians 1:10; Ephesians 4:4-6; John 17:21; Matthew 16:18; Acts 9:2 and generally the whole of the New Testament) and about there only being TWO sides (Matthew 12:30).

Not 40,001 “bodies” and a multitude of facets of relativity of sides. Much less one that sprung up 1488 years after the resurrection of Christ and some 1100 years after the Bible was put together. And certainly not a “body” that was headed by —or stemmed later from him— a fat German that modified the very Bible he said should be the ONLY reference frame (ignoring the fact that the Bible didn’t exist as one body of work until some 300 years after Christ ascended and was put together by TRADITION) who lusted after nuns and was fond of propagating the idea of raping maids if wives were not ready to put out, and who called reason, literally, “the whore of the devil”.

And you see, you really need to have been raised in that sort of confused chaotic mess of Protestant confusion and “indivi-duh-al choice” to not see the fact that the enemies of God only have ONE play.

One. That’s it. And it is always the same. Control both narratives.

When you see it, it becomes impossible to unsee.

And then if you look a little harder, study a little more, you’ll find there is a group of people who do NOT yield. They do NOT falter. They stick together even when they have different ideas, different personalities, different approaches to life.

Sedevacantists.

They have ONE Holy Mass. In Latin. As it has been since the beginning.

One set of rules, written down so it can’t be argued and changed and opined on. The Code of Canon Law of 1917, which is the most vetted document on Earth, since 26,000 documents that spanned two millennia were examined in order to produce it and ensure no rules of the Catholic Church were ever contradicted or invalidated each other. A document which has remained unchanged even after 40 years of review by clergy except for one tiny modification to one part of one code, by Pope Pious XII himself.

We have a serious, dignified process of worship, where Jesus Christ and His sacrifice is central, not us, not the priest. Him. And we bend our knee. No spinning dervishes, Jesus is my boyfriend rock songs, no LGBT flags anywhere, and our priests call out the heresy, the lies the fake clergy and the fake Popes with aplomb and regularity.

And we have reason. And logic. And Faith. And the willingness to fight whatever fight comes our way. As our ancestors did every time they were called to, and defended Christendom against all intruders.

Which is why even laymen among us will call out the fake clergy pretending to be Catholic. Because it is the duty of every Catholic to point out heretics, impostors, satanists and the enemy, wherever we see them.

Life is difficult to process and it’s hard to know who or how to fight when you either think there are many sides or are not even aware if there are sides. Life is really a lot easier when you know you are either a Catholic and thus a Christian. Or you are not.

Oh I know. It offends your liberal sensibilities. How arrogant eh? Either you are Catholic or you are not even a Christian. How dare I, eh?

Yeah. Either 2 plus 2 is 4, or you can’t do math.

How arrogant eh?

How divisive. How non-inclusive.

What lack of diversity and transgenderism! How dare I?

Right. How much sewage would you like in your ice cream, along with your false Churchianity, sir?

The truth might hurt your delicate ego, but it’s NOT hard to see. Not hard to understand. The only thing standing in your way are the lies you have been raised with, and your own ego.

The choice is yours. Either see, believe and accept the truth, and refuse to play the enemy’s game, or keep on believing whichever side of their two-card monty you have set yourself on. And lose every time.

They only have ONE play. That’s it.

And all you need to do to win is see it. And choose.

Oh yeah, and fight. But that will come naturally once you see the unvarnished, real, truth.

As those of you who follow my blog or use the search me button on the right and type in her name, I have certainly criticised Ann; for not being logically consistent and seeing that sedevacantism is the ONLY remnant of the Church left.

I have never denied, however, that I fully believe her faith is genuine (misguided though it is). That she honestly is doing the best she can to be a good Catholic. And if she ever becomes one, by abandoning the Novus Orco fake masses and fake clergy, she will, undoubtedly, make a spectacularly better Catholic than I ever will.

Sadly, I think she is too obstinate and I think not a little egocentrical (unconsciously for the most part) to ever admit her error and become a proper Catholic. If she did though… well… that would be glorious. She could potentially be the tipping point that gets the whole Church to rise up again.

In any case, in this post of hers here, she has written a semi-prophetic post. It really is required reading, you should absolutely read it.

My only question (rhetorical for me, but perhaps not for thee) is:

Ok, so how do we fight back? What’s your idea?

I know, of course, that certain topics are absolutely verbotten even just on a throwaway account on a very cheap phone you bought for cash. But I’d certainly love to know how Ann would like us all to fight back.

And I don’t mean that sarcastically or facetiously at all. I am genuinely interested.

Ann, after all, is a lady with quite an extraordinary mind on her. She might just have some idea (beyond the obvious ones) that might affect things in a big way; and might be able to do it without rivers of blood. So come Ann, if you’re ever gonna read this, let us know.

So… those of you who may have kept up on Milo’s telegram followers may recall that towards the end of September he was down to barely above 26k and later it dropped below that to 25k something.

After that he started to be a bit more “active again” with his usual “edgy” non-catholic, gay, fame whoring ways, and then he clearly got a prod from his handlers and wrote a long screed on DeSantis and, of course, coincidentally, has apparently also been seen in the vicinity of Ye.

Whether it was related to media attention whoring, or trying to distract Ye from noticing the Jew, as he has been doing rather spectacularly of late, possibly by offering Ye to overpower and abuse a “white” Jew like himself, in the way Milo has a predilection for being “overpowered” by his African tops, is unknown.

But in any event, his followers went spectacularly, in a few days, from 25k something to over 28k something. It was as if the best 3000 Chinese-bot farm followers money can buy suddenly appeared!

And then… the decline continued. From 28k plus a few days ago, to barely above 27k today, and he’s back to just his usual crass and casual blasphemy.

It is therefore, little wonder that he has just announced he will go back to twitter, where the bot farms will be far more stable now that they will be handled by pretend free-speech “enthusiast” (but not so muuuch), and “not a leftie at all even though I literally repeat whatever the WEF says”, and “not a satanic freemason at all even though I literally wore a costume as the devil’s champion”, Brother Elon.

Milo is simply now circling the drain of the typical has-been, flamboyant, gay, “icon” turned middle-aged man with the shadow of his fatness stalking him.

He did flame-out, but only to return so he could fade away with ever-shrinking little bursts of blasphemy and acidic bitterness.

The following exchange from SocialGalactic is a perfect example of the kind of functional brain damage Protestantism results in. Though this long post covers far more than just Protestantism, as I hope those of you who read it might appreciate.

While this doesn’t put poor SirHamster in a good light, the point here is not to single him out specifically, but rather to note what the underlying assumptions have to be for someone to think this way and be so persistently obtuse about something that is pretty much within the grasp of any normal, logical, child, aged 6 or 7 or more.

The entire exchange is below where I preserved the format of quoting each other in red text.

SirHamster’s initial comment is a partial quote and “criticism” of my blog post here.

And so it begins:

SirHamster

the idea is terrifying, which is why I purposely try to keep it out of my head, in effect, racking up a debt I am totally unfit to pay and the consequences of which are too horrific to contemplate, and I do this, not for any temporal joy in the here and now, but rather, for the good of all that might come after me.

That doesn’t sound like a good idea though.

And not rather (as we are slandered, and as some affirm that we say) let us do evil, that there may come good? whose damnation is just.

Kurgan

I smh.
@sirhamster your baseline protestantism probably cannot even begin to process my post in the correct manner.

Protestantism is essentially a binary thinking process at many, many, many, levels down.

Catholicism is not.
Because reality is not binary either in many respects.

For example:

Where the crusades necessary and overall a good thing? Yes.

Did crusaders kill people? Yes.

Was it required that they kill people for the greater good? Yes.

Is killing still a sub-optimal thing, regardless of the just and necessary reasons it might be required? Also yes.
Do sub-optimal things have a cost? Yes.

Understand?

SirHamster

Is killing still a sub-optimal thing, regardless of the just and necessary reasons it might be required?

You aren’t going to purgatory to suffer for “sub-optimal” behavior. Call a spade a spade.

Understand?

What I’m wondering is why you are advocating to do things that your conscience is too horrified to contemplate the true cost of.

Consider that a sign that you should not do it. I know I’m a blasted reason-hating Protestant and all, but I would think reason would pay heed to the warning light.

Kurgan

You aren’t going to purgatory to suffer for “sub-optimal” behavior. Call a spade a spade.

You really don’t know anything about Catholicism at all do you?

And the answer is yes. That is precisely what you go to purgatory for. Literally almost everyone does.

SirHamster

Call a spade a spade. Sin is sin. Optimization is related but not equivalent.

“You didn’t cook your steak optimally! Go to purgatory!” is absurdity.

When vocabulary is selected to dilute the meaning, that’s a yellow flag. Follow-up clarifies if this is a matter of wrong choice of words for communication of ideas, or intentional obfuscation to deceive.

Kurgan

Your binary thinking is noted.

As is your abysmal ignorance of Catholicism. And your grasp of language is definitely sub-optimal too. Not to mention logic, since your analogy of killing other humans, in your head is cooking a steak badly.

Seriously. If that is your grasp of this, there is zero point in discussing anything further.

SirHamster

Not to mention logic, since your analogy of killing other humans, in your head is cooking a steak badly.

That’s what the precision of “sub-optimal” covers.

Killing the body of a person made in God’s image is a lot more than just “sub-optimal”. Your choice of obfuscating language. Look, you end up in purgatory because of sin.

As is your abysmal ignorance of Catholicism.

I’m not the one turning off my reason because of terror and horror at the expected consequences of my own decisions.

SirHamster

If you’re serious about the expected spiritual results in purgatory for certain decisions, you should spend a lot less time glamorizing it as an awesome warrior thing to do that gets the job done.

Kurgan

Look, you are obviously terribly ignorant of Catholicism, you have literally zero understanding of what Catholics believe about purgatory and you are making completely idiotic binary assumptions about it based on your blinkered, limited, and wholly erroneous understanding of it.

Literally EVERYONE goes to purgatory with the exception of MAYBE some awesome saints that MIGHT go straight to heaven. Some of us will spend longer there because we take on unpleasant tasks. Just like someone who works in a sewer all day might take a longer shower than someone who works in a sterile environment building microchips.

You simply don’t have the baseline grasp of the concepts here and are speaking ignorantly out of turn. And not intelligently about it either.
You’re so wrong you’re not even addressing what you think you are, because you’re a couple of categories out from the target you think you’re shooting at.

Go read some KJV and feel better or something.

SirHamster

Some of us will spend longer there because we take on unpleasant tasks.

Again, this is spending more time in there because of your decisions. And you talk about the emotions of terror and horror shutting down your reasoned contemplation of the consequences of your decisions.

Does God give you more time in purgatory for doing the right thing?

Does God give some people dirty jobs and then punish them with more purgatory time for doing the job He assigned?

SirHamster

Just like someone who works in a sewer all day might take a longer shower than someone who works in a sterile environment building microchips.

Then don’t be terrified and horrified about taking a hellishly hot shower after your earthly life to cleanse your soul. It’s just a shower, dude.

There’s some incongruence here between different parts of the position(s) you’re taking.

If calling me a binary thinker is sufficient for you to feel good about it, have at it. But it doesn’t persuade my reason.

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen, the effect of five centuries of stunted logic and reason on the human mind. The effect of “believing” –that is, of being indoctrinated– in a binary, Calvinistic, two-dimensional, “God”.

Why, it almost sounds like the way a drunk fat German might “think” when he’s well into his cups. If you find yourself in any way persuaded by SirHamster’s “argument” I can practically guarantee two things:

1. You have literally zero knowledge or understanding of basic Catholic dogma.

2. You have a very limited ability to grasp the beauty, depth, width, truth and reality of God. Ultimately, of course, we all do, we all see through a glass darkly, but such an endemic lacuna of capability can only be the result of stunted intellectual growth, and it usually happens only with atheists, who we know are genetic misfits, or with what are essentially long-term abuses of the mind by idiotic, limited and ultimately crippling ideologies, like Islam or Protestantism. Yes, we all see through a glass darkly, but Protestantism is a welder’s face mask with some coal rubbed onto it from both sides. It only allows the simplest and brightest of light or darkness through, and as a result, the ultimate overview is invariably limited and bleak. Sincere though it might be in its error, it remains in vast error nonetheless.

Allow me then, to try to explain, as best I can, and in small steps, so that, with any luck and divine grace, perhaps one Protestant somewhere might begin to see at least a little colour into their abysmally lacking vision of “God”. It is probably a hyperoptimistic goal, but after all, we are instructed to at least try.

Titles in red bold indicate the start of a new concept. The ones in black bold are sub-concepts.

What is Purgatory?

It is a place where basically ALL of your impurities are pretty literally “burnt out of you”.

But… but… is it B-B-buh-Biblical?!

It is, of course, fully Biblical, so even the retarded concept of “sola scriptura”, should have no issue with purgatory, but as Catholics well-know, Protestants don’t actually read their Bibles, and on the rare occasions that they do, their cargo-cultist indoctrination means they have less capacity to comprehend what they read than Muslims do when reading the Koran by rote. Which is logical of course, the Muslims just learn a false teaching, while the Protestants must somehow twist their brains around to falsify a true one.

Here are some Biblical references that clearly and logically indicate that purgatory exists:

Scripture is very clear when it says, “But nothing unclean shall enter [heaven]” (Rev. 21:27). Hab. 1:13 says, “You [God]… are of purer eyes than to behold evil and cannot look on wrong…”

In light of both Revelation and Habakkuk I suppose Protestants believe themselves to perfectly clean, and fit for God to lay eyes directly upon them immediately after physical death of their bodies.

I know, it’s absurd, but as I have always maintained, the main sin of Protestants is pride. Shortly followed by utter sloth of course, which prevents them getting off their fat arses and reading about church history, the patristic fathers from the first 200 years, noting the fact that Popes existed and everyone obeyed the legitimate ones for over a thousand years and on, and on, and on. Pride and sloth. It’s literally a Hell of a way to go through life.

But let us continue…

In II Maccabees 12:39-46, we discover Judas Maccabeus and members of his Jewish military forces collecting the bodies of some fallen comrades who had been killed in battle. When they discovered these men were carrying “sacred tokens of the idols of Jamnia, which the law forbids the Jews to wear” (vs. 40), Judas and his companions discerned they had died as a punishment for sin. Therefore, Judas and his men “turned to prayer beseeching that the sin which had been committed might be wholly blotted out… He also took up a collection… and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for a sin offering. In doing this he acted very well and honorably… Therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin.”

There are usually two immediate objections to the use of this text when talking with Protestants. First, they will dismiss any evidence presented therein because they do not accept the inspiration of Maccabees. And second, they will claim these men in Maccabees committed the sin of idolatry, which would be a mortal sin in Catholic theology. According to the Catholic Church, they would be in Hell where there is no possibility of atonement. Thus, and ironically so, they will say, Purgatory must be eliminated as a possible interpretation of this text if you’re Catholic.

As we well-know, Protestants are ALL about sola scriptura! Only what’s in the Bible please! No matter how retarded the concept is since the Bible itself was put together thanks to preserved written and oral tradition some 300 years after Christ ascended.

And oh yeah, only the Bible, but the one Martin changed ok?! The one he ripped out seven books of, including, you know, all of James because it made his other retarded theory of sola fide look also just as retarded as sola scriptura. And to chink it he literally wanted to add the word “alone” after the sentence “we are justified by faith”.

Yeah. He did. He wanted to actually do that. As if his deletions and subtractions to an already edited version of the Bible (by Pharisees for 700 years) were not enough, he wanted to “add” to it. But you know, according to mental handicapped people like James White, that was probably all “god breathed”, and not, as every actual Christian with two functioning brain cells knows, “Martin farted”. And beer farted at that.

But wait… there is more…

In Matthew 5:24-25, Jesus is even more explicit about Purgatory.

Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; truly I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny (Matthew 5:25-26).

For Catholics, Tertullian for example, in De Anima 58, written in ca. AD 208, this teaching is parabolic, using the well-known example of “prison” and the necessary penitence it represents, as a metaphor for Purgatorial suffering that will be required for lesser transgressions, represented by the “kodrantes” or “penny” of verse 26. But for many Protestants, our Lord is here giving simple instructions to his followers concerning this life exclusively. This has nothing to do with Purgatory.

This traditional Protestant interpretation is very weak contextually. These verses are found in the midst of the famous “Sermon on the Mount,” where our Lord teaches about heaven (vs. 20), hell (vs. 29-30), and both mortal (vs. 22) and venial sins (vs. 19), in a context that presents “the Kingdom of Heaven” as the ultimate goal (see verses 3-12). Our Lord goes on to say if you do not love your enemies, “what reward have you” (verse 46)? And he makes very clear these “rewards” are not of this world. They are “rewards from your Father who is in heaven” (6:1) or “treasures in heaven” (6:19).

Not convinced yet? Well, you must be a good Protestant then. The brainwashing is strong in this one, master. Might he listen to Your words directly? Let us hope.

From Jesus Himself

I Corinthians 3:11-15 may well be the most straightforward text in all of Sacred Scripture when it comes to Purgatory:

For no other foundation can any one lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble—each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.

No Christian sect I know of even attempts to deny this text speaks of the judgment of God where the works of the faithful will be tested after death. It says our works will go through “fire,” figuratively speaking. In Scripture, “fire” is used metaphorically in two ways: as a purifying agent (Mal. 3:2-3; Matt. 3:11; Mark 9:49); and as that which consumes (Matt. 3:12; 2 Thess. 1:7-8). So it is a fitting symbol here for God’s judgment. Some of the “works” represented are being burned up and some are being purified. These works survive or burn according to their essential “quality” (Gr. hopoiov – of what sort).

What is being referred to cannot be heaven because there are imperfections that need to be “burned up” (see again, Rev. 21:27, Hab. 1:13). It cannot be hell because souls are being saved. So what is it? The Protestant calls it “the Judgment” and we Catholics agree. We Catholics simply specify the part of the judgment of the saved where imperfections are purged as “Purgatory.”

Objection!

The Protestant respondent will immediately spotlight the fact that there is no mention, at least explicitly, of “the cleansing of sin” anywhere in the text. There is only the testing of works. The focus is on the rewards believers will receive for their service, not on how their character is cleansed from sin or imperfection. And the believers here watch their works go through the fire, but they escape it!

First, what are sins, but bad or wicked works (see Matthew 7:21-23, John 8:40, Galatians 5:19-21)? If these “works” do not represent sins and imperfections, why would they need to be eliminated? Second, it is impossible for a “work” to be cleansed apart from the human being who performed it. We are, in a certain sense, what we do when it comes to our moral choices. There is no such thing as a “work” floating around somewhere detached from a human being that could be cleansed apart from that human being. The idea of works being separate from persons does not make sense.

Most importantly, however, this idea of “works” being “burned up” apart from the soul that performed the work contradicts the text itself. The text does say the works will be tested by fire, but “if the work survives… he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he shall suffer loss.” And, “he will be saved, but only as through fire” (Gr. dia puros). The truth is: both the works of the individual and the individual will go through the cleansing “fire” described by St. Paul in order that “he” might finally be saved and enter into the joy of the Lord. Sounds an awful lot like Purgatory.

So… yeah. As I said, Protestants don’t read their Bibles. And if they do they have the reading comprehension of a lobotomised lemur on cocaine.

But back to what purgatory is actually like…

As far as I know, even Protestants understand that Hell is, well… hellish, because of the absence of God in pretty much all His forms.

I am sure you have heard the concept that the fires of Hell, which burn more than actual fire, are at least in part, the result of distance from God. The very real knowledge that you are eternally doomed to a place with no mercy, no love, no grace, etcetera is, indeed, terrifying to anyone sane of mind.

Well, purgatory is actually a level of Hell. The only one from which, after sufficient purification, you can escape and go to Heaven.

There are many traditions of various Saints having been shown or having experienced purgatory and being permitted to tell of the experience. And it has been described by almost all of them as an unimaginably painful place to be. Some described a second in there being worse than all the misery of your worldly physical life.

Now, I don’t know about you, but that sounds pretty terrifying to me. And again, I think it would do so to anyone normal. So it is only natural that, though we are all sinners to one degree or other, we all hope to spend as little time as possible in there.

So, now that we hopefully have some baseline understanding of Catholic dogma, we come to the “accusations” of SirHaster. Some against me, and some against God, as is ever the way with atheists and heretics. Let us count, note and comment on them.

It is best if we comment on them in a logical order rather than in the haphazard order they may have appeared in the exchange on SG.

1. First his atheist-like lack of understanding about God and our relations to Him:

“Does God give you more time in purgatory for doing the right thing?“

Obviously not. This should be obvious to anyone, which is his point, and then he follows up with the atheist like nonsense.

“Does God give some people dirty jobs and then punish them with more purgatory time for doing the job He assigned?“

This is the old “switcheroo” of the atheist. God doesn’t “give us” dirty jobs. Because Calvinism is retarded. We ALWAYS have a choice. That is the whole point. It is not God assigning anything to us. We live in a world of sin because it is under the dominion of Satan.

Given that reality, you will at times be faced with choices that are extremely difficult no matter which you pick.

In my case, I am not martyr material. I am “make the other bastard die for his belief first” material.

Which, between the choice of perfect love and fighting to your last breath for a better state of things here in the temporal world is, as I say, sub-optimal.

The actions of people like St. Ignatius of Antioch are, probably, and certainly in Catholic belief, more perfect than those of say Jean Parisot de Valette. One walked to Rome for a year to be eaten by lions for his faith, the other fired the heads of Muslim prisoners into the camps of the enemy Mohammedans sieging Malta.

Intellectually I know St. Ignatius is a better man than De Valette. I really do. But my heart is not that pure. And here on Earth, I am far more likely to behave like Jean Parisot de Valette. And sub-optimal though that behaviour is, I believe it is still required. It is required by us, humans, here on Earth.

It might not be required by God. His ways are, after all, so far above ours as to be inscrutable.

Perhaps, we would all be better off submitting like St. Ignatius and thereafter, having let our enemies slaughter us and our children like lambs, the second coming would happen sooner and all would be well thereafter. And God might make it all reconciled to itself even on Earth. Sure.

But I am just a mortal man, with no great delusions about my place in the scheme of things, and from my small level of understanding, it seems to me, that if we are not to fight for our loved ones, for truth, justice and beauty also here on Earth, then, are we not cowards? Are we not letting the demons “win” even if only in an earthly sense?

Were the crusades and the fighting against the Moslems at Malta all just so much ado about nothing?

I don’t think so.

And perhaps, that is my error. But I cannot, in good conscience, see it as such. And of course, doing so or not is my choice. Not preordained by God, other than, perhaps, in the type of soul I may have, which may predispose me more towards some errors than others.

And that answers the first part of SirHamster’s false premises:

The choice is indeed mine. It might be an error and I can’t tell, I can only do what I honestly think is best. Fully knowing that my “best” can — and undoubtedly will– result is some error and thus some “punishment”, or, more precisely, purification to be required.

Now let’s look at his more insidious one: why would God punish you more for doing what some of us might think or feel is almost inevitable.

But the fact is God does no such thing.

Purgatory is not a “punishment”. It is a grace.

God allows us into His perfect presence despite our filthy habits, behaviours, erroneous beliefs, and tragic errors.

The process of “removing” these impurities from our being, mind, soul, or whatever parts of us they are embedded into, we experience as terrible pain and suffering; because we are so weak and stupid and wrong, and we are so attached to our errors they are literally embedded in our DNA, and being “stripped” of them, one nerve ending and neurone at a time, feels like Hell. That is why we suffer. Not because God is some sick sadist as the Atheists and the Protestants would have you believe, with their stunted ideology.

It is perfectly logical that a son that is headstrong, wilful, and not evil, but set in his erroneous beliefs, may go against all the warnings of his father not to climb the slippery rock face unaided, or in that particular manner, or even at all. But if the son does it anyway, because he is shaped that way, his soul strives for that peak, against even his own at least intellectual –if not heartfelt– understanding, then, what is a father to do? Assuming the son has reached the age of reason and has heard your warnings and yet still chooses to do it, because some part of him, however in error, yet still deeply a part of him you also love and respect, chooses to climb anyway, would you deny him?

Would you force him not to climb? And stunt that part of him that is perhaps mostly in error, certainly unwise, yet not without justice or love or respect for you, his father? And a part that is certainly, not without a certain (healthy, not egotistical) pride you might feel towards him, your son? Would you then, stop him by force?

If so, then it is you who lives far more in the worldly way than I, because I could not.

And if that son then falls, and breaks a leg badly, and you, as his father have to lift him up, causing him even more pain, in order to put him in your car and driving over miles of bumpy road while his thigh-bone is jutting out of his leg causing him agony at every tiny movement, would you not do it anyway?

Are you responsible and to blame for his choices made in fullness of his adult and informed reason and will and choice?

Or are you just a loving father doing what needs to be done so your son can live?

And in God’s case, live eternally in His presence, not just here on Earth.

Hopefully, if you have understood things up to here, you will, I truly hope, have understood that the Protestant view of God, free will, and Purgatory, is a blinkered, washed out, limited, binary, caricature in 8-bit grayscale.

Which beings us to the far lesser accusation of…

2. My “glorifying” my choices.

He firstly accuses me of turning off my reason:

“I’m not the one turning off my reason because of terror and horror at the expected consequences of my own decisions.“

Which in his limited and binary thought processes is all he understands when I state that I simply choose to not dwell on the time I will have to spend in purgatory. I do not dwell on it because it is pointless and counter-productive for me to do so. Unlike most people perhaps, by luck, misfortune, fate, or divine grace, I am far more aware than most what my actions and reactions may be given almost any set of extremes. Like that headstrong son, it is not that I do not believe or love my father enough. It is not that “I shut off reason” either, quite the contrary, if I am to succeed at all at climbing that slippery rock-face, I need to concentrate every ounce of reason I may have, in making the smartest moves I can in the climbing of it. For any tiny lack of focus can and probably will result in my falling spectacularly to my doom.

If I let emotions like rage or frustration or fear, take hold of me, I am unlikely to fare well.

“Ah, but what about your overall choice of climbing in the first place! You are abandoning reason there!“

No, no I am not. And perhaps, if you are a Protestant, you are too damaged by your upbringing to see it. I have explained it above, but let me try once more here too.

Within that mostly unwise, mostly wrong, mostly foolish choice to climb, there is a spark of faith, and truth, and belief in beauty and justice, that is inextinguishable. It will not go out even in the darkest storms and the howling of a million demons at our door.

And above all other qualities I may have or gain in life, I know, with a certainty that is born only of undeniable faith –a faith I always had even when I denied what I thought was “God”– that it is the one tiny part of me, that probably, might, secure my salvation.

It is easy, especially from the outside looking in, or even internally, especially when we are young, to assume or make the mistake of pride in this regard. It may present as such. It may even be wrapped in it in youth. And it is mostly misunderstood by others as pride, but when you get to its core, that tiny but never-extinguishing spark, is of, from, and dedicated wholly to, God. To his Beauty and Power and Truth and Justice. Probably, above all, once you get past even its very core, which is rooted in Justice first and Love second, but beyond it all, right at the center, perhaps, its real driving force, is Beauty.

But there is one last point I want to address, and this is a category error on SirHamster’s part, which is again, the result of stunted theological development and imagination:

3. My supposedly frightened conscience

“What I’m wondering is why you are advocating to do things that your conscience is too horrified to contemplate the true cost of.“

And therein is perhaps the root category error of it all. My conscience is not horrified at all or in any way by the concept of Purgatory. Quite the contrary, my conscience is perfectly at peace with it.

It is my human, earthly mind, attached to my worldly flesh and sensations, that is terrified at the idea of purgatory and the amount of time I may have to spend in there. My conscience is perfectly at ease. My conscience is fully committed to the concept of the ends justifying the means and the idea of us having to fight here on Earth too, as I have already explained above. It is only my weak, human flesh that is afraid. As is the weak human flesh and sensations of all but the most saintly of saints. But as I have said and know, I am no Saint Ignatius. Nor am I ashamed of saying so. I doubt you are either.

So no, I am not switching off my reason, nor glorifying my choices. Nor is my conscience in turmoil.

Far from it. I am only, in fact, letting those few, who may have souls that are shaped similar to mine, know that our way –though undoubtedly sub-optimal, undoubtedly not the wisest– still, after all, and after all the pain and strife we must inevitably endure for our choices in being this way, is too, loved by God.

We will fall. We will break our bones. We will not listen and be headstrong and we will be called prideful and arrogant or violent and un-pious, or wrong and stupid, or even –laughable as it is when you consider how carefully we reason our way up our chosen slippery rock-faces– that we have abandoned reason.

But know yourself. Know what really drives you. And trust that even God tells us, those of us like that, terrible creatures though we might be, are yet, loved by God.

After all, was David not best loved by God?

And he made it so his friend would be killed just so he could fuck the man’s wife.

I’m fairly sure I’ve not crossed that line, nor am I likely to. For all their bad actions and choices, God still loves such men, and in fact, if memory serves, they are even described as being men “after God’s own heart”.

I’ve always understood that to mean that our passions, though when not well-directed cause endless problems (for which, in purgatory, we will pay) are yet, an indication of a quality that God loves.

And if that is not beauty, what is?

If you have read my previous blog post and in any way been aware of my several posts on Milo, you may have noticed a pattern that is almost impossible to avoid seeing once you are aware of three simple facts:

1. Freemasons are serving Satan. The higher echelons do so with full awareness, some naive ignorant initiates may not do so knowingly at first, but ultimately they all do so. Milo is not naive or ignorant and he IS a Freemason.

2. Freemasons (and The Jewish media controllers, entertainer executives and bankers) ALWAYS play both sides of the coin. Always. This is literally their only ploy. Control the left and control the right. Control feminism and control the “men’s” rights groups. Control all the arguments and counter arguments then whoever “wins” in the mind of the sheeple is irrelevant because you control the puppets that control the sheeple.

3. Read Padraig Martin’s analysis of what DeSantis did and how and my overview of what that means (it’s all in the post before this one).

Just knowing those three things is enough to notice that Milo has over the last couple of days suddenly come out of a moratorium of activity and gone full on vicious homosexual cattiness on Ron DeSantis. And of all things, he’s accusing Ron of being what Milo himself was and is: a gay bottom. I’m not making this up, and the endless stream of screencaptures at the end of this post prove it beyond doubt.

Milo’s handlers also took note of my pointing out he has been haemorrhaging followers for over a year and boosted his telegram numbers by almost a thousand in a couple of days.

In other words, his handlers have now noted what Milo himself has known for a year: my exposé of him is starting to gain traction, despite the fact I have a small audience and am not anything close to a global influencer of any kind (nor do I care to be, I simply like sharing my ideas).

But that’s all sidenotes. The main thing is:

Milo has been tasked with damaging Ron’s possible path to the White House.

Including (as you will see if you go through the entire screecap screed below) something he has never done before: bringing up Ron’s supposed “bending the knee” to the Jews at the wailing wall. It’s something he has never done before because, of course, Milo is a Jew himself, and like some Jews did throughout the ages, pretends to be Catholic, all while doing everything in his power to destroy actual Catholicism.

Now… why do YOU think that is?

I couldn’t care less about American politics. I don’t live in the USA and never would live there even if they offered me citizenship tomorrow.

But if Milo the Freemason is trying to take down the ONLY politician that has effectively neutered the Jews within his state; Jews that tried to keep the status quo of fake narrative flowing and Ron kicked their ass, well… I dunno about you, but I would vote for him. And if need be go stand at his rallies to make sure he’s safe too.

I don’t like politicians as a class, but I can respect the few who do seem to put duty before personal goals. So far, DeSantis seems to be doing just that.

Tell Milo that he is a Freemason on his Telegram chat or link to one of my posts about him and watch him go banhammer crazy, like he does about literally nothing else.

But he’s clearly not out of the woods with his handlers yet either, since literally EVERYTHING he accuses DeSantis of, except his height, he’s guilty of himself:

• Being a gay bottom (Milo has admitted to being a bottom when he was not yet pretending to be “straight”)

• By extension of the above, “being someone’s bitch.” Which is PRECISELY what Milo is with his Freemasonic handlers and purse-string holders.

• Being or kowtowing to “the Jews” (Milo banned so-called “anti-semitism” on his chat shortly before he closed the chat entirely for months. Antisemitism is, of course, noticing certain facts about the Jews, like their over representation in things like media ownership, entertainment and banking)

• Getting fatter in middle age. Well, just look at him. I mean, aside from the possible bulimic, or more likely enema-based purges, Milo is putting the weight on like a depressed, gay, middle-aged man who comfort eats because he can no longer attract the same attention from other homosexuals that he used to.

• Accusing DeSantis of having pedophiles on his side. Milo literally, by his own admission on the Joe Rogan podcast was present at celebrity parties where under-age boys were being molested and he has yet to name who the homosexual predators were.

But it’s all just coincidence I’m sure, not a pattern at all. Not a fear of the only effective spiritual fighters on the planet, right?

Not a fear that Sedevacantism is increasing and proving right again, and again, and again.

No, no, surely not. Which is why Milo’s screed against DeSantis is all so fact based and not emotional and “gay man having a projection tantrum” at all.

Uh-huh. Sure. See for yourself.

The main aim of this post is not the politics of the USA, or even of Florida, or of the difference one man can make, though all of those are points that you can enjoy anyway if they interest you.

No, this is about effective results in the current war and how you achieve them. The lesson is fractal. The point everyone misses on the excellent analysis reproduced below is not what specific thing someone did somewhere, but rather the underlying and fundamental WHY some strategy or tactic works and how that knowledge can be applied to pretty much any aspect of life on Earth in the current state of global affairs; be that your personal relationship, your work, or indeed your business or political aspirations.

Tall order you say? Well, let’s see, firstly, if you aim to understand how to best grasp a very useful point of how to succeed in life in general, you will need at a minimum two things:

1. The ability to read. Yes, even long posts or books or other information.

2. The ability to process it while also retaining an over-arching goal of putting that information to use to the advantage of your best purpose, which not only can, but must, include other people around you. Yes your immediate family (the one you create above the one you are born into, but the latter too if worthy of it) but also your larger community, your neighbours, your friends, the baker you buy bread from and the farmer you buy eggs from and so on.

Why care about them? Because that is your purpose here on Earth as a man. If you do not understand that much at least, all else is just chaos and zombies, and you’re most likely one of them.

Padraig Martin has written a brilliant analysis of how Ron DeSantis made Florida the one place in the USA where it might be worth living. Here is the full text, copied with permission from his post on Gab.

What DeSantis’ did to Florida

For years, Florida was a fairly evenly divided “lean red” state. This last election, however, DeSantis’ Florida flew far right. Ron DeSantis was rewarded for many reasons, but the greatest reasons are twofold: (1) he pushed back against Fauci to keep Florida mostly open throughout Covid [except for a minor closure for a few weeks early on at the behest of then President Trump]; (2) he took on Disney, the largest single private employer in Florida, when they pushed for transgender education for kindergarteners. Floridians rewarded bravery and did not forget that he not only fought the federal government and arguably the most powerful entertainment company in the world, he also directly fought woke ideology. He banned CRT in schools including terminating teachers who taught CRT curriculum; fired District Attorneys who arrested Christian pastors during Covid; he made it a felony to harm historic monuments; he implemented a Confederate monument protection law; he deployed sheriffs, the FDLE, and the National Guard to immediately crush George Floyd protests in major Florida cities; he is the only governor, to date, to create a statewide Antifa Task Force, to identify, arrest, and prosecute far left extremists. In all, DeSantis literally went to war against the left – but how did he get away with it? Redistricting and disarming.

While kissing “The Wall” in Jerusalem and signing a toothless antisemitism bill, (raised Sedevacantist) DeSantis carefully persuaded Jewish power brokers in Southeastern and Central (Orlando) Florida to cut up their own districts. The argument that DeSantis laid out was essentially the following: “By bridging your suburban Miami or Orlando districts with rural districts, you may lose some portion of concentrated Jewish influence, but you will gain that influence through Evangelical Christians in red districts who look at Judaism favorably.” They agreed and DeSantis further assured them with an antisemitism bill to allay their fears. As soon as they agreed, DeSantis cut up those districts into unfavorable sections. This is why the deep blue power centers in Southeast and Orlando (Disney) Florida flipped red last night. He engineered a quiet coup over their power.

Once that was achieved, DeSantis set about dismantling traditional all-black districts. Florida has one of the smallest black populations in the South (approximately 17%). In the post-Voting Rights Era, Florida was forced to assign districts that were ridiculous. One example was FL-5, which extended from Jacksonville to Tallahassee – nearly 165 miles, on a thin strip at the northernmost point of the state. DeSantis broke those apart and redistricted them into more favorable White rural locations. When the Jewish powerbrokers of South Florida, led by the ADL, realized what was happening, they led a small revolt in the Legislature. But their influence was already destroyed by DeSantis in 2020, when he used their own greedy desire for more power against them. When they accused DeSantis of being antisemitic for killing Jewish and black districts, he showed rural Florida voters pictures of him kissing the wall and referenced the toothless antisemitism bill: “What are these Jews talking about? Look at me…” He even used anti-DeSantis rhetoric from Dissident Right circles to embolden Florida legislators to continue the course: “My redistricting of Jewish districts is not antisemitic. Even White nationalists know I am pro-Jewish. The Jewish powerbrokers AGREED to this redistricting. Keep cutting them up…”

This morning, the full weight of nearly four years of carefully reengineering Florida’s political dynamics by DeSantis has done the following: obliterated Jewish influence over state politics, eliminated black Congressional districts and assigned them to loyal rural White constituencies, and worked with anti-Communist Cuban powerbrokers to inherit the power away from their Jewish and black competitors in Southeast Florida. In essence, DeSantis lead a quiet coup in the third largest state in the US and won an election by nearly twenty-points, when only four years ago, he won by half of a percentage point.

Now, before I comment on his post, a couple of side issues that are not directly related to his post but relevant to the point I want to make.

Padraig Martin is one of the few accounts on Gab that is consistently posting useful information that can be acted on. Gab was a somewhat initially naive attempt at having a “free speech” platform. I say naive for a number of reasons, firstly, there has never been and never will be anything such as free speech. No speech anywhere, by anyone, in the entire history of humanity has ever been, or will ever be, free. Literally everything you say or write can, and will, be used against you. Not just in a court of law, but in everything from an argument six months later with your wife to having you executed in china for saying the wrong thing.

As a result, Andrew Torba found his Gab initially infested with what I call the Alt-retards, basically would-be neo-nazi incels going on about what a great man Hitler was and posting “shocking” truth or half-truths about the Nazi ideology, and how because there really were NOT gas chambers in Auschwitz, somehow that makes the Nazis, the purest and bravest and most humane soldiers ever.

Now, none of these guys are of much use, but they created an atmosphere that resembled a bit more the earlier days of the internet, where you could pretty much write anything without worrying too much about being arrested for calling Bruce Jenner… well, Bruce Jenner.

The general atmosphere on Gab is one that has a very strong sense of “naming and exposing the jew” and doing so not only in absurd ways, but, in fact, in perfectly legitimate ways. Such as, for example, pointing out the Jewish overrepresentation by factors of ten in media, entertainment and finance, or the kind of general mass PR assaults that Kanye West is currently undergoing, which would absolutely NOT happen if he were to say, make the same comments about white people, or the Chinese, or Appalachian rednecks.

This however has allowed a more intelligent and critical thinker to express thoughts, ideas and facts that are simply not tolerated in the deep state and/or Jewish controlled media, such as Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, Parler, Twitter (yes, even after Musk) and on, and on, and on.

Enter a few commentators like Mr. Martin.

And so what? You may say?

Here is what:

Andrew Torba, whether by initially naive assumption or not, has managed to create an online ecosystem that tolerates a far more actually diverse and far-ranging pool of ideas than just about anywhere else, and, one where pointing out factual observations is permitted to a much larger extent than, again, almost anywhere else online.

This is a GOOD THING.

No, the speech is still not free, and never will be, but it is free-er, than almost anywhere, except, maybe, as my Russian friend says, in the kitchen, with your good friend, with the door closed.

A good flow of FACTUAL information is pivotal in any conflict situation. Particularly when, or if, you might not even realise you’re in a conflict situation yet. A lot of people think Covid, and the Russia vs The diaspora Jews via America and their neocons, is all just bad luck, or coincidence. And they think that the coming economic collapse is also just a consequence of unforeseeable things. They may even think Zelensky or Biden or Macron were voted into power. Or that the genetic mutant serums they call “vaccines” are for your own good.

Yeah, I know. Sad. But then… we now have undeniable proof that some 98% of people are complete idiots, and of the remaining 2% that are not, at least half are probably satanically evil. And half of the remaining 1% are probably either greedy, scared, still trying to figure out things from a secular perspective and getting depressed, or otherwise irrelevant.

So… that leaves us, the, shall we say optimistically, 0.5% that understand at least on some level that:

1. We have been at war the whole time and it’s just become obvious over the last 3 years.

2. Numbers are not anywhere near as relevant as people assume.

3. The fight is spiritual in origin, and the Christian religion is the one that best describes it. (And that means Sedevacantist Catholicism, but I don’t expect any other than a very tiny percentage to be there. Yet.) Nevertheless, it is fought mostly here, in the physical realm you and I live in, and the results here MATTER.

4. If, you understand at least those three things above, you are far less likely to be black-pilled, depressed and possibly suicidal. But… you are likely still frustrated. With anything from your personal situation to the lack of armies of pitchfork and torch-wielding men storming the castles of the puppeteers and the “elite” that have and are, orchestrating all the demonic stuff you see happening all around you.

Here is the piece you’re missing, strategically speaking:

We are in a completely corrupt world under the dominion of the Prince of Lies, and you have very little understanding of how to win when fighting in that world.

So here is the key point:

In order to win the fight, when you’re in a condition where the enemy certainly does not follow the somewhat mythical “honourable rules of just war”, guess what;

You need to fight dirty.

Mr. Martin’s observations are mostly a simple description of what DeSantis did to win.

And there is a LOT of useful information in that.

You can pick up quite a bit just from that, like, for example:

1. The fact that DeSantis played the “kiss the wall” and wore a Jewish skull cap for the photo shoots and even used his own Jew-hating detractors to point out “hey, if these guys hate me, I can’t be an anti-semite”, in light of what he actually did, a clear insight into the fact that he is not above playing lies to liars.

2. The fact he was raised Sedevacantist probably will not mean much to almost any American, because most of them have zero understanding of what that even means. And if they THINK they know, they almost invariably still have only WRONG ideas about it. So I don’t expect the subtler and deeper point of this to be seen by any but an extremely tiny minority, but the fact remains that considering how tiny a population actual Catholics are today (Sedevacantists) the impact we have on the world is disproportionate to just about any other community when considered per capita.

Mel Gibson, DeSantis, and yes, yours truly too, though my audience is very tiny when compared to them, my impact on the spiritual battalions is almost certainly higher, at least in terms of people who have returned to the truth and become sedevacantist Catholics. Why would that be, unless… we are, in fact, acting in accordance with the highest reality to the best of our very limited ability?

3. His willingness to appear as something other than perfect even to what could be his supporters, as long as he ends up winning a better position in real terms, aside from what it may look like in propaganda terms. This shows that DeSantis understands how actual combat works. It really doesn’t matter if some people think you’re a “bad” or “weak” or “traitorous” man, as long as you bury the enemy and are the one left standing. People are fickle and their memories short. And remember, the winners write the history books anyway. Win the fight, and guess what, just like Norm mcDonald said “Wow, what are the chances, in every war, ever, the good guys won! Every time! It says so right here, in this book!”

Win. Worry about appearances later.

Up to here you might think that all I am advocating for then, is a rather merciless and simple rule of the ends justifying the means.

But that’s not the case.

Yes, the ends DO justify the means. As long as those “ends” are ultimately aligned with reality, God and Truth.

It is terribly easy to fall into some ego trap when acting “as wise as serpents”. Only those who TRULY believe, who DO subjugate their own wishes, ego and status to God, can navigate these murky waters of deception in war.

But all the best Catholic Warriors have done so.

Whether Mel Gibson in navigating PedoHollyWeird, DeSantis in liberating Florida from wokeism, or Bohemond by bribing a guard at Antioch to take the city against all odds.

And this lesson applies to other environs as well.

I have recently counselled a young man that if he had stuck rigidly to the dogmatic prescriptions of Catholic courtship, would have remained single. He tried it and that is where it was going and in fact was.

The he tried the Kurgan method of courtship and marriage and he is now baptised, engaged and will soon be confirmed and married as a proper Catholic.

I an NOT saying my way, or DeSantis’ or Mel’s is the “right” way, or, even more laughably, the only way, not at all. It is technically at some level, at least somewhat morally questionable, but, and it is an IMPORTANT but, because for once, it is not put there to defend personal choices. Instead, the “but” is simply this:

The results provide a proof that the sins incurred, at least within certain limits, are acceptable.

Lying to liars is fine.

Murdering murderers would similarly be acceptable, though, of course it’s illegal.

Fooling conmen in order to provide a better life for their victims has to be acceptable overall, if not in the particulars, at least in general terms.

Which is not to say that I don’t expect I and those like me will not be punished in the after-life if not before then. I expect I will be. And yes, if the apparent testimonies about purgatory are true, the idea is terrifying, which is why I purposely try to keep it out of my head, in effect, racking up a debt I am totally unfit to pay and the consequences of which are too horrific to contemplate, and I do this, not for any temporal joy in the here and now, but rather, for the good of all that might come after me. I do not have the soul of a martyr and as such my troubles here on Earth are minor when compared to those who do.

They pay a heavy price here and a light one in the hereafter.

While I appear fine on the outside, and in the here and now, but in reality, my time in purifying flame will be enormously higher.

As always: Know yourself.

If you are of the mercenary turned Catholic crusader sort, then understand your limitations, but also, be aware of what a difference you can make.

And remember that as I said in BELIEVE! The book that has resulted in over a hundred converts to Sedevacantist Catholicism:

Sometimes, making the light grow, means setting fire to enemy encampments.

Learn from the DeSantis and Gibsons of the world, and start pushing back. It’s ok to get a bit dirty in war, after all. I mean, what do you want? A pristine Navy Uniform? What are you? Gay?

So… one of the few commentators that has been worth listening to on the whole Russian – American war, is Pepe Escobar.

Did I say Russian vs. America?

Oh, sorry, I meant Russia vs. Israel, but really more the Jewish Diaspora in the USA than Israel itself. Which was noted when Israel very, very quickly reassured Putin that Israel would absolutely NOT be providing weapons to Ukraine. After Russia told them it would be a bad idea to do so.

That said, the recent withdrawal from Kershon has Pepe all full of pepito and saying “this is WAR!” And you can feel his spic blood boiling in frustration as he types on his telegram chat.

I mean, I get it. We Dagos can be just as excitable as the Spics, or sudacas, I am not really sure which HispanoPurtugeSouthAmer(ind) place Pepe is from. He’s a good guy anyway, but his latest assessment of the withdrawal from Kershon is flawed. He labelled it as the worst strategic defeat since 1991 for Russia.

But even more astonishing, he did so even AFTER posting this piece from someone else:

I fully agree with Mr. Prigozhin’s opinion on Surovikin’s decision. Yevgeny Viktorovich very accurately noted that Surovikin saved a thousand soldiers who were in actual encirclement.

After weighing all the pros and cons, General Surovikin made a difficult but right choice between senseless sacrifices for the sake of loud statements and saving the priceless lives of soldiers.

Kherson is a very difficult area without the possibility of a stable regular supply of ammunition and the formation of a strong, reliable rear. Why was this not done from the first days of the special operation? This is another question. But in this difficult situation, the general acted wisely and far-sightedly – he evacuated the civilian population and ordered a regrouping.

So there is no need to talk about the “surrender” of Kherson. “Surrender” together with the fighters. And Surovikin protects the soldier and takes a more advantageous strategic position – convenient, safe.

Everyone knew from the very first days of the special operation that Kherson was a difficult combat territory. The soldiers of my units also reported that it was very difficult to fight in this area. Yes, it can be kept, it is possible to organize at least some supply of ammunition, but the cost will be numerous human lives. And this forecast does not suit us.

Therefore, I believe that Surovikin acted like a real military general, not afraid of criticism.

He is responsible for the people. He sees better.

Thank you, Sergey Vladimirovich, for taking care of the guys! And we will not stop hitting the enemy and we will not get tired.

https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/3080

Join Slavyangrad

@Slavyangrad

Now… it doesn’t take a genius to understand that a general that doesn’t care about what is shown on TV, and instead worries about wasting his men on useless propaganda and sees they don’t get killed that way, is a good general.

But being a good general, for most people today, brainwashed by TV and mass media, is equated to looking good like a Hollywood war film. With sound track and special effects.

Because we have reached a point where the average couch potato doesn’t understand that the newspapers and the news, and all the journalists in the world, do not mean a damned thing when you trade in bombs and bullets instead of press releases and green screens.

What, exactly, do you think the Russians actually lose by letting go of Kershon and making sure 1,000 or so of their men are alive instead of trapped like rats?

“Oh but it looks bad!”

Really?

Does it look better to have them lose a 1,000 men and then STILL not hold Kershon?

What’s that, you say? Oh I see, lose a thousand men or more but keep hold of Kershon. Yes, I see, just tell me… why, exactly?

When you can take it back in winter. In a way that the PR machine can’t do anything about it.

Or in spring.

Or in summer.

Or in a negotiation for a final end to the war without further bloodshed.

“But… but…” says Pepe and his friends and readers, “Russia is asking for negotiations now?!? This is bad! Very bad! Russia is weak and asking for negotiations, it sends a message of weakness.”

Ummm… Pepe, did you forget this is WAR?

I mean you said it yourself… it’s WAR.

Let me tell you what an old Sicilian Mafioso told my dad one day on a construction site in the Northern Alps.

“If you want to make sure you kill a man with a lupara, (sawn off double barrel shotgun) you shoot him from two meters away.

If you use a handgun, you want to be shaking his hand when you shoot him.”

What does Russia lose by asking for negotiations?

Option 1: If they get what they want, great, and the war ends (at least superficially and for the global news cycle, before the Diasporas in Washington start something else up again).

Option 2: the Nato-Diaspora-Bankers say no, and Russia keeps everything as it is now AND gets the PR credit for trying to come to the table, but the vicious diasporas rejected it, see? So… eh, what can we do? We need to carry on nuking you.

Option 3: the glue-sniffing retards in the USA, AND the cock-aine addled, gay, midget, clown’s puppet masters all huff their own farts and believe their own bullshit to the point they launch some “winter offensive”, and promptly send a few more thousand Ukis and their cheerleaders from the Western special ops teams to their graves. Ooopsies.

Option 4: nothing much happens and Russia eventually retakes Kershon in due course. In their own way. At their own pace, and with minimal loss of Russian soldiers.

Because that’s what’s gonna happen.

One of those 4 options. And I really don’t see the down side of any of them.

So that’s what Russia is doing.

Because they have plenty of time, and like chess.

Some of you who keep up with my blog will be aware of various individuals that supposedly “homestead” which is the Americanism for live off the land and/or your large or small non-commercial farm as the case may be.

By non-commercial I mean simply that it’s not part of some conglomerate, and that you do the farm work yourself.

The romantic idea is that you can live off the land while admiring beautiful sunsets in the evening and having lazy morning coffee on your terrace, overlooking your self-sustaining, off grid, garden of Eden. All while you film your House and Home perfect lifestyle in HD quality video and picture perfect rustic chic attire.

The reality is that if you have a regular family it’s not quite that way.

I’m going to give you a few scenarios, from “easiest” to “advanced” levels of difficulty.

1. The lone cowboy setup.

If you ever watched the really bad series Fear the Walking Dead, then you know there are several episodes a few seasons in where this lonely cowboy who has awesome six-gun skills, lives alone off-grid (spoiler alerts). But then he meets a woman (the actress from Dharma and Greg, older but still attractive) and of course, in the end, he dies. Because women.

Before that however, he is shown to live very comfortably in a tiny cabin, powering his needs with a small windmill.

Now, assuming your needs are very modest, (he didn’t use computers, phones or TV and his electric needs seemed to be limited to maybe a small washing machine and some lights) you might get away with as little as say 1kw of energy on demand. That lets you run a small kettle or hand drill or possibly a small washing machine. Individually that is. Not all together.

And that set up would already cost you several thousand dollars/euros/loads of crates of ammo/bison pelts, or whatever currency eventually becomes valid after the inevitable economic collapse. And depending on your location would not be enough. Also, it’s very unlikely that a single small windmill would be enough unless you live in some kind of natural wind tunnel.

And while solar works, it’s not cheap and again, depending on where, and your climate the difference can be huge between summer and winter. But… all that said, if you START OUT with off-grid as your priority, it can be possible.

However… until it becomes actually a non-crime to shoot the zombies that roam the Earth, you also need to deal with local bureaucracy. And depending on the country you live in and local regulations, a BUNCH of reasonable things might not just be regulated, but even outright illegal. In many places in the USA for example, you are not allowed to harvest rainwater. Which sounds crazy to me but is real.

But let’s say you have got over these hurdles of having enough power and enough clean water for your needs (and these two factors are NOT a small thing, believe me) now comes the living off the land part.

And here is the part I personally would prefer in an ideal world (that’s just me though, maybe): all else being equal, if it were possible, I would prefer to live where I can create all or at least most of my food by hunting, fishing and gathering. Yes. Yes I would.

Farming is not really my thing. It’s hard work, and maybe if you’re good at it it’s easier and more regularly fruitful than hunting, but… I KNOW how to hunt. I’m good at it. I’m a pretty crappy farmer and not particularly interested in it, though I see and respect immensely those people who not only are good at it, but enjoy it.

There is no accounting for taste, as my Roman compatriot ancestors used to say, and some people have a natural affinity to be farmers. But, call it genetic self-selection, epigenetics, or whatever, but I come from a traceable line of men who excelled at hunting, fighting, exploring and adventuring, on their own terms as much as possible, that goes back over 800 verifiable years. We’ve never been good at sitting still in one place and calmly planting potatoes or gathering olives. When we did stay still in one place it was usually in a fortress from which we would defend our peasants, defeat our enemies or launch war parties or even crusades on distant lands.

So, that might just be me, but be that as it may, farming is more widely acceptable and available than hunting for all your food in most parts of the world and certainly in all of Europe and the less rural parts of the Americas and even Africa, not are wild animals as plentiful in much of the Asian continent. So farming it is.

Well, to feed even just a couple you need to be able to plant and harvest a variety of crops in enough quantity to be able to store enough of it to last you the year, whether to feed yourself, your livestock, or a combination of both.

That requires quite a bit of land just for crops, fruit trees and what have you. And it still won’t be enough, which means that you will need at least some chickens, maybe goats or even larger farm animals, and they need to be fed, so either you have large areas of pasture, or, you need to feed them some of the crops you plant. Or you need to have enough surplus crops you can sell them and earn enough to feed your family and animals.

The activity of feeding yourself and your animals will occupy every spare bit of time you have and if you have some bad weather will still not be enough.

The reason farming worked was because communities of people came together and shared the workload.

Let me explain. As a single man living in your one man off-grid cabin, your food requirements are much lower than if you have to feed a family of wife and five children, as I do, and even then it would be tough. But easier. But when you bring in women and children, the only realistic way to do it is for the men to organise themselves and distribute tasks. 5 men can do a lot more per capita than one man alone. The specialisation of skills and distribution of tasks increases the efficiency by multiples at are more than the mere sum of the parts.

If you have to till the field yourself, build a greenhouse, plant and water all the plants, protect them from parasites and wild animals and the weather, harvest and store or conserve them all by yourself, I think most modern men with almost the zero knowledge of the farming processes they have, are more likely to die of starvation in year one or two than to thrive.

And that is as a one man show. Add in a few small children and a wife and your ability to feed them all off the land off grid purely from farming, becomes truly daunting.

A tractor become essential. But they also need maintenance and fuel. Which are costs and processes that also require a functioning infrastructure.

In short, the point becomes that, although the lone cowboy setup os the easiest, it naturally leads you to understand the need for community.

2. The small tribe setup.

This is where either a largeish family or small group where you have between 2-4 adult males and a similar or usually larger number of dependents, that is either small children or women and young boys that are not particularly useful at farm work. While this setup is logistically more complicated than the lone cowboy setup, it has a generally better chance of producing more food as well as take care of all the incidental stuff that invariably comes up.

Because even of you buy a place that already is picture perfect, the animal fencing will need maintaining, the wood stockpile for heating in winter needs cutting and stacking, the various “trouble-free” off-grid solutions will require adjusting, tinkering, expanding —when they don’t need outright fixing— any produce you do harvest needs storing, canning, cooking, or however you might conserve it for the rest of the year. And the million other things you haven’t necessarily allowed for or know about that you will need to improve, fix, educate yourself on, and so on. Having more than one man to address both the recurring issues as well as the incidental ones, that can alternate each other at various times makes for a huge boost in efficiency and, perhaps even more important for the average man, a huge boost in morale.

Few things are as soul-crushing as planning your day’s work only to have it regularly scuppered by the many incidental issues that happen on a farm, not to mention the ones that happen even more regularly if instead of the small tribe setup you have the…

3. The large but young family setup.

This is where a single family only has one or maybe two men in it but about 2-4 dependants per man in it. It is the setup I am personally most familiar with having 5 children and a wife and only period or occasional help from my friends who are still making plans to move here and turn our little community into a small tribe setup. While the two older girls can sometimes help with smaller tasks, these tend to be inside the home rather than out in the field and are mostly a help to the woman in the home, but not without a similar investment in time of other nature. Clothes and dishes all need regular washing, drying and so on, the home —especially older farmhouses or large cabins— needs regular dusting and cleaning, and this is only made worse if you do not have enough electrical power to run domestic appliances like washing machines, dishwashers, vacuum cleaners and any power tools you need to fix up or improve incidental things.

To this you need to add the time and care required to look after the smaller children, and with 3 of them under age 4, it becomes quite the task for the wife. Which in turn means the husband is for the most part left to his own devices when it comes to the rest of the farm work. If and when one of you, or even worse, both, get sick or injured, the workload required simply to get by can be overwhelming.

If you don’t have a very strong relationship what feels like intense pressure, often of a somewhat lonely nature, since the man is out working the farm and the woman is in taking care of the children, it will strain you both to quite possibly a breaking point. Especially if one or both of you have not had a realistic idea about the time and effort it takes to live this way.

In this respect, traditional Catholic (sedevacantist) life is very helpful since we marry until death do us part. Although, for Churchian versions of “catholicism” it might just increase the murder rate!

If you decide to homeschool, the issue becomes initially even worse, though over time it actually becomes easier as the older children begin to help with chores as well as the teaching of their younger brothers and sister by a sort of sibling osmosis that is natural among children.

Although I jest about the murder rate, it can be difficult for a woman if she is not clear on the long term goals from the start and doesn’t have a fully committed approach to her family and the Catholic religion. We have seen this first hand with secular couples with plenty of money, children in school and a good setup struggle to deal with the realities of farm life, while we know almost penniless couples with 6 children, all under 11 or so, who homeschool, that are a real joy to see and despite the difficulties are truly happy families with extremely well-adjusted, smart and imaginative children.

The religious aspect for this kind of setup is probably where you see most of all how pivotally important it is. While the religious aspect is also fundamental in all the other setups, it is not as blatantly obvious to see unless you are living it honestly; in which case, as you work in the field, you’ll often find yourself meditating on the efficacy of prayer, the wisdom of Catholic dogma, the miracle of Holy Mass, confession, and how it helps and sustains you in ways you would never have guessed at in decades of secular contemplation.

Catholicism, the real, dogmatic, “hardcore” sedevacantist version, is —contrary to ALL the propaganda against it you have been taught from birth— not hard at all. Not a burden. It is, as is written in the Bible, an easy “burden” to carry. It literally makes life easier, more beautiful and your family happier and saner.

This is not something I expect anyone to simply take my word for, you need to experience some things for yourself before you can understand them. However, if you simply use your powers of observation and logic, you will notice that religiously homogenous groups are very coherent and resilient to modern assaults on their family units. This is true even in those religions that frankly, have rather large flaws in them, like the Amish or Islam or Mormonism, although, in many of those religions there are aspects of insularity and even abuse that are not part of Catholicism proper. While Catholics are dogmatically not to pray in the temples of pagans, heretics, schismatics, and heathens, or in conjunction with their heathen prayers, they are not instructed to shun contact with such people. On the contrary, we are told to spread the good news even to irritating atheists, and not by forcing our beliefs and faith on them, but by conversing with them when they wish to do so, and more importantly, by leading by example.

Similarly, the Catholic principles of marriage are quite demonstrably the best way to ensure a balanced family life that is harmonious and truly, deeply, in tune with reality, which beings a peace and serenity that materialistic secularism simply can’t compete with.

A strong, healthy, family unit is the basis of any civil, just society, and no religion on Earth compares in terms of quality of life and civilisation produced when measured alongside real, traditional Catholicism (which today means sedevacantism). The role of the man and the woman in Catholicism are not plagued by that rigidity and inflexibility present in the fake versions of “christianity” expounded by 40,000 denominations of protestantism, which either pedestalise women in an unhealthy, feminist, believe-all-women-all-the-time nonsensical position, or, conversely, place them in a subjugate position as little more than a maid and sex slave with no right to an opinion.

In Catholicism, the role of the woman is respected and represented and venerated most of all in remembering the behaviour of St. Mary, the mother of Jesus. And while it is true that the man is the patriarchal head of the household, his role is equivalent to that of Jesus towards his flock, that is, to lead and instruct; gently and calmly, and patiently and lovingly, though also firmly and decisively when required, but ultimately, at heart, in a spirit of self-sacrifice than can, and when needed should, go all the way to literally giving your life for you wife and children, if it comes to it.

Women are not relegated to a role of second class citizen, in a Catholic household. They are celebrated and appreciated for their role of mothers, wives, nurturing feminine power and joy they bring to the family and home, while not being allowed to ride roughshod over their husbands with the excuse of being women and thus above reproach or fault.

In a classic Catholic society, a rapist would have a difficult time surviving his atrocious transgression at the hands of the Catholic men who become aware of his having raped any woman, but a woman falsely accusing a man of rape would certainly be ostracised by literally everyone in such a society, with very little chance of her behaviour ever being forgotten by anyone and her insertion into society probably being limited to a life of penance, as would be the case for similar crimes by anyone, male or female.

If I have strayed a little into broader aspects of Catholicism and their effects on society at large, it is only because in the large but young family setup it is the most fundamental aspect that will be most practically helpful to face all the various adversity you will encounter.

But let it not be said that despite the difficulty, such a setup is not rewarding. In terms of providing all the food you need for your family, this is probably the most difficult setup, even with a tractor and good earth, it will be long days throughout the year to be fully self-sufficient. But the rewards of seeing your family grow, and become increasingly capable, able and most of all, free of the mental rot of the world, is incomparable in terms of the sense of fulfilment and satisfaction it gives.

The next step up in terms of difficulty then is…

4. The proper Catholic community setup.

While the actual feeding from the land of all the members of it is almost undoubtedly easier in this setup, since specialisation will make things easier by orders of magnitude, new issues will crop up, and once again, the religious aspect will be fundamental in the success or failure of such a community in the long term.

Coherent, homogenous communities with shared belief systems are demonstrably more resilient in time than the supposed ideal “diversity is our strength” fiction that has been fostered on all of us from birth over the last 80 years or so. Even clearly unhealthy cults like the branch davidians, jonestown cultists and so on are able to keep together even up to and including mass suicide.

Now, obviously, mass suicide is not “the way” and one can argue that multi-wife groups such as mormons have serious flaws with things like child abuse, yet the general point of cohesion by religion is undeniable. All that is left is to differentiate between religions and their overall success in time. The Amish in America have been reasonably successful, but they are clearly very insular, and lately, this has resulted in an increasingly confrontational effect with the dark powers of the satanic federal government. Which is easier to do for the satanists since most people see the Amish as these harmless oddities that are, however, not really any concern of theirs.

A Catholic community is both insular in the sense that its members know, support and help each other regardless of personal differences, but it is also integrated in the world and moves among it respecting those secular laws that align with or at least don’t directly contradict fundamental Catholic dogma. Ultimately, as Catholics expand and begin to take over governmental functions, they can better integrate their community with the most successful, harmonious, civilising process that humanity has ever seen, that is, the Catholicising of pagans, heretics, atheists and heathens simply by a process of effective creation of safe, serene societies of high trust.

At this point, the bigger problems will be initially the interpersonal relationships. While as Catholics the dogma is uniform and as such the divergence in religious practice is extremely minimal or nil (the opposite of any protestant setup) the human frailties will begin to come to the fore, and more worryingly and damaging, the infiltrations. The most insidious being the ones that are genuinely (or at least appear to be) due to an excess of Catholic charity. Allowing that Una Cum mass guy i to the community. Tolerating this or that Novus Orco priest because he’s such a nice man. Letting a nice atheist couple join in as though they were fully Catholic couple into all the various community efforts and activities. And then, before long, you have homosexual parades with naked transvestites telling you your five year old should have gender reassignment surgery. And instead of such a freak being institutionalised you’re arrested for merely suggesting he’s a mentally unstable danger to children everywhere.

Catholic community needs Catholic leadership, and Catholic leadership comes in two formats:

The Spiritual, which is the highest order. With priests leading the community in terms of their spiritual work, day to day reverence and weekly mass. Bishops above them organising the parishes and presiding over larger community issues while also participating in and providing various sacraments, such as the perpetuation of holy orders and so on and ultimately, culminating in the Pope (which we have not had a valid one since 9th October 1958, hence sedevacantism).

And the practical, which traditionally was represented by the nobility, with a larger hierarchy than the spiritual but just as regimented from a military point of view. Kings Princes, marquises, counts, barons and so on.

And the various laypeople, regardless of their station, be they peasants or kings, all aware of their duties and responsibilities to each other and the wider community. The military or shall we say practical branch of Catholicism subject to the clergy, but also acting as a check against the very clergy they are subjugate to if and when this becomes heretical or unjust.

It is a fine balance, and human flaws will invariably present challenges, but it is, overall, a system whose weakest point is only the permission of infiltration of destructive ideologies. Catholic communities have created the safes, most just, most beautiful, most civilised countries on Earth. And they have done so all around the planet. The relatively recent huge damage to actual Catholicism, the usurpation of the Papacy by satanic freemasons and so on has only occurred in the last 70 years or so, though, of course, the attacks have been ongoing from the start. But it was only the result of the relaxation of the Catholic military or lay arm of the Church Militant, that we got to the pervasive fakery, destruction, and degeneracy of the fake “catholic” Novus Ordo. We should have dragged out the homosexual, Freemasonic, child rapists, that had infiltrated the Church right away and put them to their deserved punishments right away. Bit we did not. We tolerated these infiltrators and as a result their trojan horses unleashed hell on Earth, as we see today. So this will be the challenge. To return to the correct balance of proper Catholic leadership that will never compromise on allowing deviancy to enter our midsts.

The biggest challenge will, paradoxically, not be keeping the deviants out. It will be to have enough people understand their place in the scheme of things and accept the equivalent of monarchy (ideally by an equal measure of meritocracy and piety) to replace the failed, insidious, perverse concept that “democracy” is a good thing. It is nothing of the sort.

Democracy is to civilisation the perfect analogy to the satanic freemason pedophile infiltrating your immediate family.

It is designed to give the ILLUSION of relative personal freedom (aimed overwhelmingly at mostly sexual degeneracy) while in reality, the people who decide everything remain completely occulted by the puppets we call presidents, senators, mayors and governors that they put in place to supposedly rule us as we have “voted” for.

5. Theoretical diverse communities.

It is unlikely that if you have no affinity for Catholicism, or at least some curiosity for it, that you will have read this far, but if you have, and are shaking your head in some protestant induced incredulity, or a Hindu or Muslim, or Buddhist induced one, the fact remains that you have undeniable proof of the fact that Catholicism has endured for some two thousand years (not the longest of all religions, but close) and produced the best societies on Earth bar none. Sure, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism have all produced societies, but they are NOT as pleasant, effective or functional to live in as Catholic ones. The only partial exceptions might be Japanese Shintoism and Zen Buddhism, but Buddhism has proven to be ineffective at protecting itself from even aggressive assault, never mind subterfugeous infiltration. And Japanese Shintoism is only able to provide a safe society by that very same process of almost total isolation and rejection of any cultural infiltration that we should take note of. And while some of us might be quite comfortable in a zen shintoist society, it is not what is most suitable for western Europeans.

This, of course, now leaves the slight gap of perceived light for the American version of the Eastern “Orthodox” which is really more of a subset of screeching autists than actual Eastern Orthodox. I have never really had a theological argument with actual Russian or Greek Orthodox, be it laymen or priests. We just sort of glance at each other with a slight curling of one corner of the mouth, an arched eyebrow of disapproval at each other’s respectively assumed schismatism, and carry on in our way.

But the American Autist “Orthodox” is at pains to try and hijack history, reality and scripture, to try to point out how THEY are the real Church. You know, despite the Filioque being obviously Catholic in the New Testament to anyone capable of reading, the betrayal of the Orthodox at EVERY turn of the Crusades and of the Catholics who came to save them, (and did so some 40 years AFTER the Orthodox defected!), their absolute inability to show any valid Apostolic Continuity, particularly in the Russian branch, and their denial of the fact that there were always Popes for over a thousand years and everyone understood that their decision was the final arbiter of any disputes.

So, in conclusion, not only are the alternatives to Catholicism simply not able to measure up to the communities created by the Catholic religion, but the theoretical multi-religious, diverse ones have now been conclusively proven to be untenable and little more than an excuse to infiltrate and destroy the communities that Catholicism has and did create, and that will do so again.

Final Thoughts

As we have looked at e progression from lone cowboy setup to fully Catholic large community, the problems have changed from having enough time, power and clean water to feed your immediate family to how to prevent infiltration and general community degeneration by a lackadaisical approach to dogma.

As some problem diminish, new ones appear. This is the nature of life on Earth.

If you have understood this core point, then, you MIGHT begin to appreciate a few concepts I will simply list here, add a few notes and hopefully let you ponder on your own in the context of how these truths are intrinsic of reality and well represented in Catholicism specifically:

1. Why the Church here on Earth is called the Church Militant.

Because we are in an endless war with the enemy, Satan, his demons and their possessed or willing servants in human form as well as the possibly simply evil things that may or may not have a supernatural basis.

2. Why the American concept that “happiness” is a worthwhile, sensible, or even achievable goal is an essential perversion of reality.

If you think life is all about being happy as much as possible, you are going to have a terribly sad existence. See point 1 above. That is where you are. In the middle of a war on a planet ruled by an eternal spirit of evil, degeneracy and lies. Your purpose here is not to be “happy”. It is to do your duty as a soldier in combat. In the doing of that, there is honour, satisfaction, and yes, even true, genuine happiness, but there is also suffering, sacrifice, heartache and death. Such is war. Fight it dutifully like a man. Identify the enemy, help your comrades in arms and root out all the i filtrating spies. That is how you live a worthwhile and noble existence.

3. Why the American concept of “free speech”, is moronic, and particularly “absolutists” in this regard, are completely retarded, have no understanding of reality whatsoever, and are weakminded, brainwashed fools.

Is that upsetting you? Good. It’s about time someone woke you up.

No speech, anywhere, in the entire history of the human race has ever been, nor will it ever be in the future, free. And even more importantly, it should never be so.

Do you think in heaven you can swear like a sailor and use the word “motherfucker” at will?

Do you think you should be able to?

Do you think if you were healthy and pure you would want to?

And let me not use my standard example of a pedophile coming to your front door and telling you he is looking forward to raping your children at the earliest opportunity.

The idiotic “absolutist” at that point says something like: “oh well but then he is stating his intent of committing a crime!” Or “that’s not political speech!” Or some equally moronic non-argument.

In a just, polite, and Catholic society, of course, such a person would immediately be jailed for life, and if the father of the threatened children were to immediately bury him in the backyard in a shallow grave, a jury of his peers would be lenient, charitable and understanding, possibly limiting his punishment to a few hours of community service. Or handing him a small pension and a medal for his service to society, you know, depending on the details.

4. Why your LARPING at being a “Christian” of any denomination, is meaningless time-wasting as contemptible as watching “reality” TV.

Unless you know in your heart that you’re willing to die rather than deny Jesus Christ as the King of Kings, your “christianity” is only a veneer of Churchianity. And Churchianty does not create functioning civilisations. Why was Shitoist Zen able to create a functioning society? Or Chinese Taoism? Or Islamic Fundamentalism? Or Pagan Rome? Or Pagan Sparta?

Because each of those civilisations were composed of men willing to choose death over life without adherence to the ideology and codes of behaviour of their culture and religion.

The difference is that Catholicism created a civilisation that is undeniably superior in terms of efficiency, justice for all, and respect for the individual than any of those other alternatives mentioned above. The exceptions might be in terms of beauty, which is at least a little subjective anyway. I do find Japanese art and architecture and landscaping beautiful, as I do certain aspects of Roman art or engineering, but one can appreciate beauty in more than just one’s culturally specific forms.

Lastly then, to close the circle, remember that if you are spending your days watching “homesteaders” that pass several hours a day streaming about the minutiae of their life while they tell you how you should move to the country so you can feed your family by hieing the ground and raising cattle, it’s a little more complicated than that. You can get a more realistic sense of things by following The Kurganate videos on my YouTube channel here, or at least watching real farmers who don’t gloss over the hard work. If you can spend 4 hours a day live-streaming you’re certainly not doing your own farm work.

So I hope this post gives you a bit more perspective and helps you prepare better if you do want to make the change from whatever you’re doing now, to idillic off-grid farmer.

It is definitely the right choice for me and my family, but make sure it is for you and yours before jumping in with both feet and a blindfold of faith in some guy on YouTube who says some things you might agree with.

This, lumbering turd in human form is :

Michael wrote this absolute trash about how rejoicing in the death of “anti-vaxxers” is a must.

And originally his piece was called “Why shouldn’t we dance on the graves of anti-vaxxers”

Cheerful little piece of excrement isn’t he?

Personally I hope he is “vaxxed” and boosted to the gills and that he takes all flu shots and any boosters that may come his way.

I really do.